Table 2.
Food cup responding in phases 1 and 2
| Group | n | Phase 1 |
Phase 2 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light | Tone | Light | Tone | ||
| Experiment 1 | |||||
| Cons-VEH | 7 | 12.7 ± 4.5 | 54.4 ± 12.7 | 7.6 ± 3.5 | 46.7 ± 12.9 |
| Cons-NBQX | 8 | 11.2 ± 2.7 | 53.9 ± 11.3 | 10.4 ± 2.3 | 51.3 ± 10.7 |
| Surprise-VEH | 8 | 15.8 ± 5.4 | 45.8 ± 9.7 | 11.8 ± 4.3 | 52.5 ± 6.7 |
| Surprise-NBQX | 7 | 13.9 ± 3.8 | 51.3 ± 12.4 | 8.8 ± 2.6 | 52.1 ± 9.1 |
| Experiment 2 | |||||
| Cons-VEH | 8 | 7.3 ± 2.5 | 51.4 ± 5.5 | 14.2 ± 4.2 | 57.6 ± 5.9 |
| Cons-NBQX | 9 | 8.9 ± 4.7 | 51.3 ± 8.8 | 8.2 ± 3.0 | 52.9 ± 8.4 |
| Surprise-VEH | 6 | 12.3 ± 3.3 | 63.4 ± 12.5 | 8.4 ± 2.6 | 65.4 ± 9.2 |
| Surprise-NBQX | 6 | 14.1 ± 2.9 | 55.7 ± 11.8 | 18.4 ± 4.8 | 59.9 ± 11.9 |
| Experiment 3 | |||||
| Cons-VEH | 8 | 5.1 ± 1.7 | 62.5 ± 10.3 | 5.9 ± 1.4 | 71.1 ± 9.9 |
| Cons-NBQX | 6 | 11.3 ± 3.1 | 60.2 ± 11.8 | 4.6 ± 1.4 | 53.3 ± 11.4 |
| Surprise-VEH | 8 | 15.7 ± 3.0 | 60.6 ± 7.1 | 14.0 ± 4.1 | 75.1 ± 8.3 |
| Surprise-NBQX | 6 | 17.4 ± 6.7 | 65.4 ± 7.5 | 12.9 ± 5.0 | 57.2 ± 9.6 |
| Experiment 4 | |||||
| Cons-VEH | 8 | 18.4 ± 5.9 | 61.3 ± 10.0 | 22.8 ± 5.7 | 69.4 ± 10.5 |
| Cons-NBQX | 8 | 19.4 ± 4.2 | 63.7 ± 6.8 | 17.3 ± 4.9 | 67.0 ± 6.2 |
| Surprise-VEH | 10 | 19.8 ± 5.1 | 73.0 ± 19.8 | 20.8 ± 5.8 | 72.0 ± 4.7 |
| Surprise-NBQX | 8 | 22.7 ± 7.3 | 59.9 ± 6.2 | 19.2 ± 5.0 | 62.9 ± 6.4 |
Data are the mean ± SEM percentages of time with head in food cup on light→tone→food trials. n, Number of subjects; Cons, consistent; VEH, vehicle control.