Skip to main content
. 2006 May 31;26(22):6062–6068. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5582-05.2006

Table 1.

Mean optical density values ± SEM for trace- and pseudo-conditioned rabbits on the trained and nontrained hemisphere for the barrel hollow and wall of rows A, B, C, and D

A B C D
Barrel hollow
    Trace-conditioned
        Trained 56.09 ± 3.34 56.16 ± 3.20 55.67 ± 3.49 54.02 ± 3.12
        Nontrained 56.45 ± 6.01 56.58 ± 6.49 56.68 ± 6.23 55.68 ± 6.04
    Pseudo-conditioned
        Trained 65.06 ± 14.34 61.62 ± 10.97 59.68 ± 10.41 55.43 ± 6.63
        Nontrained 51.76 ± 6.79 53.16 ± 6.66 52.84 ± 6.48 54.07 ± 6.47
Barrel wall
    Trace-conditioned
        Trained 50.41 ± 2.93 50.16 ± 2.70 49.75 ± 2.64 46.76 ± 2.68
        Nontrained 49.76 ± 5.18 51.58 ± 5.55 51.16 ± 5.66 49.68 ± 5.40
    Pseudo-conditioned
        Trained 55.95 ± 12.75 52.58 ± 9.12 51.97 ± 8.28 49.00 ± 6.00
        Nontrained 45.59 ± 5.57 47.40 ± 6.20 47.04 ± 5.95 46.84 ± 6.73

Optical density measures for rabbit whisker cortical barrel rows stained with cytochrome oxidase after trace conditioning or pseudo-conditioning.