Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 1;26(5):1366–1377. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3889-05.2006

Table 1.

Effects of temperature at the calyx of Held synapse

Parameter Average across cells
Paired
RT PT Percentage change p (paired t test)
P8–P10
    EPSC (N = 9)
        Amplitude (nA) −8.0 ± 1.26 −13.8 ± 1.9 75 ± 15 <0.001
        10–90% rise time (ms) 0.33 ± 0.025 0.22 ± 0.016 −39 ± 2 <0.001
        Half-width (ms) 1.2 ± 0.12 0.71 ± 0.073 −49 ± 3 <0.001
        Charge (pC) −16 ± 2.8 −16 ± 2.5 0 ± 10 >0.05
        Quantal content 279 ± 50 284 ± 44 4.0 ± 9.2 >0.05
    mEPSC (N = 9)
        Frequency (s−1) 4.7 ± 1.3 9.3 ± 1.8 167 ± 38 <0.05
        Quantal size (pA) −53.1 ± 7.5 83.3 ± 12.3 62 ± 10 <0.001
        10–90% rise time (ms) 0.30 ± 0.04 0.21 ± 0.02 −26 ± 4 <0.001
        Half-width (ms) 0.69 ± 0.09 0.46 ± 0.06 −32 ± 3 <0.001
        Charge (fC) −57 ± 9.3 −57 ± 8.7 5 ± 7 >0.05
    Depression (100 Hz; N = 9)
        Paired-pulse ratio 0.53 ± 0.10 0.52 ± 0.07 7 ± 11 >0.05
        Steady-state EPSC (nA) −0.31 ± 0.08 −1.8 ± 0.49 486 ± 82 <0.001
        Steady-state depression (%) 95 ± 3.3 84 ± 3.8 −12 ± 4 <0.001
        qSteady-state (pC) 1.1 ± 0.28 3.0 ± 0.78 198 ± 25 <0.001
    Recovery from depression (N = 10)
        Percentage fast 16.7 ± 2.0 34.1 ± 4.5 127 ± 30 <0.05
        Rate (s−1) 0.61 ± 0.09 1.2 ± 0.14 104 ± 21 <0.01
P16–P18
    EPSC (N = 5)
        Amplitude (nA) −8.6 ± 1.9 −14.5 ± 3.0 82 ± 35 <0.05
        Charge (pC) −7.1 ± 2.0 −6.2 ± 1.5 −6 ± 12 >0.05
    mEPSC (N = 3)
        Quantal size (pA) −62 ± 16 −88 ± 15 51 ± 18 <0.05
        Charge (fC) −34 ± 8.6 −29 ± 4.7 −10 ± 9 >0.05
    Depression (100 Hz; N = 5)
        Paired-pulse ratio 0.83 ± 0.08 0.77 ± 0.03 −5 ± 7 >0.05
        Steady-state EPSC (nA) −1.4 ± 0.43 −4.3 ± 1.1 219 ± 45 <0.01
        Steady-state depression (%) 83 ± 2.8 70 ± 2.5 −15 ± 2 <0.01
        qSteady-state (pC) 2.4 ± 0.61 3.7 ± 0.94 58 ± 21 <0.05
        Refilling rate (model fit; s−1) 4.3 ± 0.29 10.9 ± 0.8 157 ± 20 <0.01

For each parameter, the mean ± SEM value taken across cells is given for each temperature condition (RT and PT). On the right, we calculated the average percentage change of each parameter after raising temperature from RT to PT based on a paired comparison within each cell.