TABLE 5.
Model comparison by BEAST analysisa
Molecular clock model | Demographic model | Mutation rate | 95% HPD | Log marginal likelihood (SS) | Log marginal likelihood (PS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Relaxed clock, exponential | Coalescent exponential population | 1.045 × 10−4 | 5.6508 × 10−5, 1.6026 × 10−4 | −23,632.61 | −23,632.33 |
Relaxed clock, log normal | Coalescent exponential population | 1.5723 × 10−4 | 6.6297 × 10−5, 2.6341 × 10−4 | −23,632.24 | −23,631.94 |
Relaxed clock, exponential | Coalescent Bayesian skyline | 1.225 × 10−4 | 6.8056 × 10−5, 1.8561 × 10−4 | −23,622.27 | −23,621.7 |
Relaxed clock, normal | Coalescent Bayesian skyline | 1.257 × 10−4 | 7.4641 × 10−5, 1.8208 × 10−4 | −23,623.27 | −23,623.38 |
Strict | Coalescent exponential population | 5.4535 × 10−5 | 4.3983 × 10−5, 6.5605 × 10−5 | −23,757.07 | −23,756.55 |
Strict | Coalescent Bayesian skyline | 5.476 × 10−5 | 4.2365 × 10−5, 6.7008 × 10−5 | −23,746.58 | −23,746.95 |
95% HPD, 95% highest posterior density; SS, stepping-stone sampling; PS, path sampling.