Skip to main content
. 2019 May 7;104(9):4024–4032. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00073

Table 2.

Association of Impaired Fasting Glucose vs Normoglycemia With Outcomes

Outcome Normoglycemia Impaired Fasting Glucose Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
No. of Events/No. at Risk (%)
Composite adverse renal outcomea 314/5424 (5.8) 221/3897 (5.7)
 Unadjusted model 0.95 (0.80–1.14)
 Adjusted model 0.97 (0.81–1.16)
Worsening kidney functionb 114/5424 (2.1) 79/3897 (2.0)
 Unadjusted model 0.91 (0.68–1.22)
 Adjusted model 1.02 (0.75–1.37)
Incident albuminuriac 203/2691 (7.5) 147/1928 (7.6)
 Unadjusted model 1.01 (0.81–1.25)
 Adjusted model 0.98 (0.78–1.23)

Adjusted model: age, sex, race, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, prior cardiovascular disease, body mass index, statin use, aspirin use, and trial treatment arm.

a

Defined by worsening kidney function or incident albuminuria.

b

In participants without CKD at baseline, worsening kidney function was defined by a decrease in the eGFR of 30% or more to a value of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. In participants with CKD at baseline, worsening kidney function was defined by a decrease in the eGFR of 50% or more or the development of ESRD requiring long-term dialysis or kidney transplantation.

c

Defined for all study participants by a doubling of the ratio of urinary albumin/creatinine from <10 mg/g at baseline to >10 mg/g during follow-up.