Skip to main content
. 2019 May 30;6(4):764–773. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12453

Table 4.

The association between urobilin, sphingomyelin (30:1), and systolic and diastolic function, as evaluated by left ventricular ejection fraction and isovolumic relaxation time, respectively

Metabolite Systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, n = 755) Diastolic function (isovolumic relaxation time, n = 824)
β valuesa, 95% CI P‐value β valuesb, 95% CI P‐value
Urobilin −0.70 (−1.03 to −0.38) 3 × 10−5 47 (−46 to 141) 0.32
Sphingomyelin (30:1) 0.41 (−0.48 to 1.31) 0.37 6 (−255 to 268) 0.96
a

β values can be interpreted as the change in ejection fraction (%) for each standard deviation unit increase in the metabolite measurement. Lower ejection fraction implies worsened systolic function.

b

β values can be interpreted as the change in isovolumic relaxation time (milliseconds) per standard deviation unit increase in the metabolite measurement. Higher isovolumic relaxation time implies worsened diastolic function.