Table 3.
First author, journal, and year of publication | Number of patients | Quantitative analysis | Comparison with tagged MR | Comparison with LGE | Functional recovery | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chronic infarction | |||||||
Garot et al., Radiology, 2004 | 9 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | NA | NA |
Koos et al., International Journal of Cardiology, 2011 | 50 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 100 | 86 |
Altiok et al., European Heart Journal CVI, 2013 | 29 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 86 | 51 |
Oyama‐Manabe et al., European Radiology, 2011 | 19 | Yes | No | Yes | No | 95 | 47 |
Acute infarction | |||||||
Neizel et al., Circulation CVI, 2009 | 38 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 97 | 94 |
Neizel et al., JACC, 2013 | 26 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 82a | 75a |
LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; MR, magnetic resonance; NA, not applicable.
Cut‐off value of <31 s for early diastolic strain rate.