Table 6.
Comparative frequency distribution of complexity and improvement grade: by treatment provider.
| Serial no. | Complexity grade | Faculty | Percentage | PG trainee | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Easy | 11 | 4.50 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Mild | 23 | 9.42 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Moderate | 26 | 10.65 | 6 | 16.66 |
| 4 | Difficult | 117 | 47.95 | 23 | 63.88 |
| 5 | Very difficult | 56 | 22.95 | 7 | 19.44 |
| Serial no. | Improvement grade | Faculty | Percentage | PG trainee | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greatly improved | 126 | 51.63 | 29 | 63.88 |
| 2 | Substantially improved | 87 | 35.65 | 5 | 19.44 |
| 3 | Moderately improved | 28 | 11.47 | 2 | 16.66 |
| 4 | Minimally improved | 03 | 1.25 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | No improvement/worsening | 00 | 00 | 0 | 0 |
PG, postgraduate.