Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 16;18(3):3092–3096. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10621

Table I.

Comparison of the relative expression levels of miR-27a and miR-31 among patients with different data in observation group.

Variable n miR-27a t value P-value miR-31 t value P-value
Sex   0.388 0.703   0.017 0.986
  Male 23 0.0086±0.0009 0.00625±0.0008
  Female 17 0.0085±0.0009 0.00621±0.0008
Tumor site   0.000 1.000   0.000 1.000
  Rectum 16 0.0085±0.0009 0.00623±0.0009
  Colon 24 0.0085±0.0009 0.00623±0.0008
Lymph node metastasis   4.307 <0.001 11.742 <0.001
  Yes 23 0.0135±0.0008 0.00836±0.0010
  No 17 0.0063±0.0001 0.00515±0.0006
Distant metastasis 31.929 <0.001   4.120 <0.001
  Yes 12 0.0165±0.0011 0.00716±0.0009
  No 28 0.0059±0.0009 0.00598±0.0008
Histological type   3.907 <0.001
  Mucinous carcinoma   7 0.0076±0.0010 0.00601±0.0008
  Non-mucinous carcinoma 33 0.0099±0.0008 0.00656±0.0009
Duke's grade 49.602 <0.001 15.859 <0.001
  A and B 30 0.0035±0.0010 0.00413±0.0010
  C and D 10 0.0212±0.0009 0.00959±0.0007