Table 1.
Characteristics of the takeaway food outlets participating in the Takeaway Masterclass and evaluation activities, North East England, April 2016
| Baseline* | Attended Masterclass | 6-week follow-up | Semi-structured interviews | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA group | BA group | FU group | All | BA group | FU group | All | BA group | FU group | All | |||||||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Food outlet type | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fish and chips | 2 | 22 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 22 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 20 | 1 | 33 | 2 | 33 | 3 | 33 |
| Pizza, burger and kebab | 5 | 56 | 4 | 57 | 5 | 45 | 9 | 50 | 4 | 57 | 3 | 38 | 7 | 47 | 2 | 67 | 2 | 33 | 4 | 44 |
| Chinese | 0 | 0 | – | 1 | 9 | 1 | 6 | – | 1 | 13 | 1 | 7 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Indian | 1 | 11 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 14 | – | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | ||
| Café/sandwich | 0 | 0 | – | 2 | 18 | 2 | 11 | – | 2 | 25 | 2 | 13 | – | 2 | 33 | 2 | 22 | |||
| Multi-cuisine | 1 | 11 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total n | 9 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 9 | ||||||||||
| IMD quintile | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 (most deprived) | 3 | 33 | 3 | 43 | 8 | 72 | 11 | 61 | 3 | 43 | 5 | 63 | 8 | 53 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 17 | 2 | 22 |
| 2–5 | 6 | 67 | 4 | 57 | 3 | 27 | 7 | 39 | 4 | 57 | 3 | 38 | 7 | 47 | 2 | 67 | 5 | 83 | 7 | 78 |
| Total n | 9 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 9 | ||||||||||
BA, before and after; FU, follow-up; IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.
*
Two food outlets (Chinese (IMD quintile 1) and pizza, burger and kebab (IMD quintile 1)) declined to take part in BA group but did attend Masterclass and so joined FU group.