Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;19:167. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1165-3

Table 1.

Example of how to combine effect size and variance of change score of CH and CRF within studies

Study Outcome (mmHg) SMILE LASIK Effect size (Hedges’ g) Variance of Hedges’ g Combined effect size Correlation between CH and CRF Combined variance
Mean SD N (eye) at last follow-up Mean SD N (eye) at last follow-up
Alper Agca [38] CH −1.94 1.52 30 −1.98 1.5 30 0.03 0.06 −0.07 0.71 0.06
CRF −2.96 1.69 30 −2.69 1.44 30 −0.17 0.07
Di Wu [39] CH −1.94 0.82 37 −2.34 1.08 34 0.42 0.06 0.48 0.71 0.05
CRF −3.59 0.91 37 −4.29 1.6 34 0.54 0.06
Wenjing Wu [40] CH −1.86 1.13 75 −2.23 1.33 75 0.3 0.03 0.4 0.71 0.02
CRF −3.14 1.06 75 − 3.8 1.53 75 0.5 0.03
Bingjie Wang [41] CH −2.55 1.44 50 − 2.53 1.38 56 −0.01 0.04 0.4 0.71 0.03
CRF −2.24 1.29 50 −3.33 1.34 56 0.82 0.04

Abbreviation: CH corneal hysteresis, CRF corneal resistance factor, LASIK laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, SD standard deviation, SMILE small incision lenticule extraction