Table 1.
Example of how to combine effect size and variance of change score of CH and CRF within studies
Study | Outcome (mmHg) | SMILE | LASIK | Effect size (Hedges’ g) | Variance of Hedges’ g | Combined effect size | Correlation between CH and CRF | Combined variance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | N (eye) at last follow-up | Mean | SD | N (eye) at last follow-up | |||||||
Alper Agca [38] | CH | −1.94 | 1.52 | 30 | −1.98 | 1.5 | 30 | 0.03 | 0.06 | −0.07 | 0.71 | 0.06 |
CRF | −2.96 | 1.69 | 30 | −2.69 | 1.44 | 30 | −0.17 | 0.07 | ||||
Di Wu [39] | CH | −1.94 | 0.82 | 37 | −2.34 | 1.08 | 34 | 0.42 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.71 | 0.05 |
CRF | −3.59 | 0.91 | 37 | −4.29 | 1.6 | 34 | 0.54 | 0.06 | ||||
Wenjing Wu [40] | CH | −1.86 | 1.13 | 75 | −2.23 | 1.33 | 75 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.71 | 0.02 |
CRF | −3.14 | 1.06 | 75 | − 3.8 | 1.53 | 75 | 0.5 | 0.03 | ||||
Bingjie Wang [41] | CH | −2.55 | 1.44 | 50 | − 2.53 | 1.38 | 56 | −0.01 | 0.04 | 0.4 | 0.71 | 0.03 |
CRF | −2.24 | 1.29 | 50 | −3.33 | 1.34 | 56 | 0.82 | 0.04 |
Abbreviation: CH corneal hysteresis, CRF corneal resistance factor, LASIK laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, SD standard deviation, SMILE small incision lenticule extraction