Table 4.
Proportion of nutrition abnormalities via nutrition screening tools
| NST | Proportion of low risk patient’s n (%) | Proportion of mild-moderate risk patient’s n (%) | Proportion of high-risk patient’s n (%) | Study ID |
| MUST | 12 (16.7) | 27 (37.5) | 49 (68.1) | Bamba et al[9] |
| 118 (68.2) | 18 (10.4) | 37 (21.4) | Csontos et al[30] | |
| 93 (84.5) | 12 (10.9) | 5 (4.5) | Haskey et al[35] | |
| 10 (25.0) | 6 (15) | 24 (60) | Takaoka et al[13] | |
| NRI | 5 (31.3) | 11 (68.8) | Sumi et al[27] | |
| NRS-2002 | 0 (0) | 24 (33.3) | 48 (66.7) | Bamba et al[9] |
| 13 (32.5) | 27 (67.5) | Takaoka et al[13] | ||
| SaskIBD-NRT | 89 (80.9) | 12 (10.9) | 9 (8.2) | Haskey et al[35] |
NST: Nutrition screening tools; NRS-2002: Nutrition Risk Screening 2002; MUST: Malnutrition universal screening tool; NRI: Nutritional Risk Index; SaskIBD-NRT: Saskatchewan Inflammatory Bowel Disease Nutrition Risk Tool.