Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 8;34(1):155–162. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey328

Table III.

Estimated percent changes and 95% CIs for semen quality parameters associated with underweight, overweight and obesity compared with normal weighta.

Characteristic Underweight (n = 1815) Normal (n = 22 762) Overweight (n = 5070) Obese (n = 302)
Percent change (95% CI) P Percent change (95% CI) Percent change (95% CI) P Percent change (95% CI) P
Semen volume, ml −3.6 (−7.7, 0.7) 0.10 0 (ref.) −4.2 (−6.8, −1.6) 0.002 6.0 (−4.3, 17.5) 0.27
Sperm concentration, 106/ml −3.0 (−5.8, −0.1) 0.042 0 (ref.) 0.3 (−1.5, 2.2) 0.72 1.7 (−5.1, 9.0) 0.63
Total sperm number, 106 −6.7 (−11.3, −1.9) 0.007 0 (ref.) −3.9 (−6.9, −0.9) 0.012 7.1 (−4.6, 20.9) 0.24
Total motility, % −0.7 (−2.1, 0.7) 0.32 0 (ref.) 0.3 (−0.6, 1.3) 0.46 1.1 (−2.2, 4.6) 0.51
Progressive motility, % −0.6 (−2.1, 1.0) 0.47 0 (ref.) 0.6 (−0.4, 1.6) 0.25 1.1 (−2.6, 4.9) 0.56
Total motile sperm count, 106 −7.4 (−12.4, −2.2) 0.006 0 (ref.) −3.6 (−6.9, −0.2) 0.036 8.9 (−4.3, 24.0) 0.20

N refers to the number of subjects in each BMI category.

aBMI was categorized using the WHO criteria: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2). The number of underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese subjects were 222, 3046, 660 and 38, respectively.

Linear mixed models were used to estimate percent changes and 95% CIs with adjustment for age, ethnicity, education, smoking, marital status, abstinence period and season.