Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 19;40(4):e493–e501. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy071

Table 3.

Associations between overall outdoor time and dietary patterns of children stratified by site (N = 6229)

Outdoor time (h/day)a Healthy dietary pattern score Unhealthy dietary pattern score
β SE P β SE P
Australia (Adelaide) 0.17 0.03 <0.0001 0.04 0.03 0.17
Brazil (Sao Paulo) 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.03 0.02 0.18
Canada (Ottawa) 0.16 0.03 <0.0001 0.004 0.03 0.91
China (Tianjin) 0.18 0.04 <0.0001 0.04 0.04 0.23
Colombia (Bogotá) 0.05 0.04 0.21 0.05 0.04 0.16
Finland (Helsinki, Espoo and Vantaa) 0.18 0.03 <0.0001 0.04 0.03 0.15
India (Bangalore) 0.11 0.04 <0.01 0.10 0.04 <0.01
Kenya (Nairobi) 0.04 0.03 0.19 0.03 0.03 0.21
Portugal (Porto) 0.16 0.05 <0.0001 0.03 0.04 0.44
South Africa (Cape Town) −0.05 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.21
UK (Bath and North East Somerset) 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.15
USA (Baton Rouge) 0.10 0.03 <0.001 0.08 0.02 <0.01

SE, standard error.

aOverall outdoor time (h/day) was calculated as [(5 × outdoor time on weekdays) + (2 × outdoor time on weekend days)]/7.

Unstandardized beta coefficients are presented and models are adjusted for age, sex, highest level of parental education, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, screen time and body mass index z-scores.