Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;29(1):106–118. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx309

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Modeling the effect of anatomical distance and contralateral homology. (A) Modularity for genetic correlation networks and random networks as per Figure 1B. For model networks, inter-regional correlation is based on what would be predicted based on the statistical relationship with anatomical distance within and between hemispheres (Fig. 2) and a noise parameter θ (θ=0 in this subplot). (B) The modularity (averaged across densities) of the model networks at different values of θ, which superimposes noise on top of the predicted relationships. For θ=0.18, the modularity of the model networks intersects with that of the actual ρg network. (C) Probability density plots of the average within-module correlation in gene expression (rGE, see Fig. 3): for the actual ρg network modules (black line); for modules derived from 1000 randomly generated networks (light gray distribution); and for modules derived from 1000 modeled networks with the same modularity as the actual ρg network (dark gray distribution).