Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 30;75(Pt 8):696–717. doi: 10.1107/S2059798319008933

Table 2. Classification results.

For each trial shown, the models indicated by • were classified into the classes specified by ○, where W, S, H and M refer to water, sulfate, heterogen and metal, respectively. The S, H and M classes were taken as equivalent for ‘not water’. Accuracy and F 1 scores are as in Table 2 (smallest population as the positive condition). The details of each data set can be found in Section A1.

  Input models Scored classes    
Data set W S H M W S H M Accuracy F 1 score
Training 2312745 solvent models from 17274 structures (0.6–5.0 Å)
 1         1.00 0.98
 2 Not water 0.99 0.92
 3 0.99 0.82
 4 Randomized 0.92 0.02
Validation 89824 solvent models from 2573 structures (0.7–4.3 Å)
 1         1.00 0.96
 2 Not water 0.99 0.90
 3 0.99 0.81
Testing 69817 F oF c > 3.0σ peaks from 2493 structures (0.7–4.5 Å)
 1         0.99 0.98
 2 Not water 0.99 0.90
 3 1.00 0.80