Skip to main content
. 2019 May-Jun;24(3):55–63. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.055-063.oar

Table 2. Comparison of morphological characteristics among skeletal patterns.

Cast analysis Skeletal Class I (n = 30) Mean ± SD (mm) Skeletal Class II (n = 30) Mean ± SD (mm) Skeletal Class III (n = 30) Mean ± SD (mm) p-value
IC-cusp maxilla 31.7 ± 3.2 31.7 ± 3.6 32.8 ± 2.4 0.22
IC-cusp mandible 24.0 ± 2.8 24.5 ± 2.7 25.8 ± 3.0 0.03*
IC-gingiva maxilla 23.7 ± 2.4 23.3 ± 2.6 25.3 ± 2.9 0.01*
IC-gingiva mandible 19.1 ± 1.8 19.3 ± 3.0 20.4 ± 2.2 0.03*
IM-cusp maxilla 46.4 ± 8.1 48.0 ± 3.6 49.9 ± 3.1 0.04*
IM-cusp mandible 42.1 ± 3.4 42.6 ± 3.4 44.0 ± 3.8 0.40
IM-gingiva maxilla 34.5 ± 3.3 34.1 ± 3.2 36.2 ± 2.9 0.03*
IM-gingiva mandible 31.3 ± 2.8 32.5 ± 2.8 37.5 ± 2.7 0.02*

n = 90; SD = standard deviation, Kruskal-Wallis test, *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001.

IC = intercanine width, IM = intermolar width.