Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 3;12:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.06.004

Table 3.

Areal BMD gm/cm2 and areal BMD z-scores over during the course of the study (population: ITT).

N, mean (SD)
Placebo Alfacalcidol Risedronate
Lumbar Spine aBMD g/cm2
Screening 76, 0.76 (0.20) 71, 0.79 (0.21) 68, 0.78 (0.19)
6 month 68, 0.79 (0.18) 63, 0.80 (0.22) 59, 0.82 (0.19)
One-year 72, 0.80 (0.19) 67, 0.83 (0.21) 58, 0.85 (0.17)



Lumbar spine aBMD z score
Screening 76, − 1.15 (1.15) 68, − 0.91 (1.04) 66, − 1.04 (1.17)
Screening-calculateda 76, − 1.15 (1.15) 71, − 0.96 (1.04) 68, − 0.99 (1.19)
6 month 68, − 1.17 (1.07) 61, − 0.95 (1.12) 57, − 0.84 (1.16)
6 month-calculateda 68, − 1.17 (1.07) 63, − 1.01 (1.15) 59, − 0.79 (1.18)
One-year 72, − 1.13 (1.10) 67, − 0.99 (1.07) 58, − 0.74 (1.17)
One-year-calculateda 72, − 1.13 (1.10) 67, − 1.00 (1.07) 58, − 0.75 (1.15)



Total body less head aBMD g/cm2
Screening 75, 0.91 (0.14) 70, 0.93 (0.16) 68, 0.91 (0.13)
6 month 68, 0.93 (0.13) 62, 0.94 (0.17) 58, 0.93 (0.13)
One-year 70, 0.92 (0.12) 65, 0.97 (0.16) 59, 0.96 (0.13)



Total body less head aBMD z score
Screening 75, − 0.57 (0.99) 67, − 0.4 (1.09) 66, − 0.63 (1.08)
Screening-calculateda 75, − 0.57 (0.99) 70, − 0.63 (1.64) 68, − 0.65 (1.08)
6 month 68, − 0.62 (0.99) 59, − 0.29 (1.19) 56, − 0.50 (1.08)
6 month-calculateda 68, − 0.62 (0.99) 62, − 0.49 (1.55) 58, − 0.52 (1.08)
One-year 70, − 0.70 (0.94) 65, − 0.46 (1.28) 59, − 0.46 (1.09)
One-year-calculateda 70, − 0.70 (0.94) 65, − 0.57 (1.47) 59, − 0.44 (1.08)

Least Median Squares (LMS) method [22].

a

Includes z-scores for five patients (all visits) who were below five years of age that were calculated using.