Table 4.
uIP obtained for the measurement of the median of the minimal Feret diameter of the different materials by experienced trained labs referred to as partner 1 (P1), partner 2 (P2), and partner 3 (P3), and by two independent test persons (TP1 and TP2).
| Material | uIP P1 (%) | uIP P2 (%) | uIP P3 (%) | uIP TP1 (%) | uIP TP2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERM-FD100 18,500× | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| ERM-FD100 68,000× | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 31.7; 1.9 1 | 5.3 |
| ERM-FD304 18,500× | 1.3 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| ERM-FD304 68,000× | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Gold nanorods | 3.4 | 7.4 | 4.4 | 29.5; 23.8 1 | 7.2 |
| NM-100 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 15.8 |
| NM-103 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 6.3 | 2.3 |
| NM-212 | 6.7 | 9.0 | 6.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
1 The analysis was performed in duplicate by the test person, while using two independent sets of optimized image analysis settings.