Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 18;19(14):3160. doi: 10.3390/s19143160

Table 7.

Obtained accuracies for the benchmark datasets with hand-crafted methods and deep learning methods.

METHOD UCF101 HMDB51 Weizmann
Hand-crafted Hierarchical [55] - - 72.8%
Far Field of View [63] - - 100%
HOOF NLDS [46] - - 94.4%
Direction HOF [45] - - 79.17%
iDT [76] - 57.2% -
iDT+FV [76] 85.9% 57.2% -
OF Based [81] - - 90.32%
Edges OF [15] - - 95.69%
HOG features [87] - - 99.7%
Deep learning Slow Fusion CNN [110] 65.4% - -
Two stream (avg) [117] 86.9% 58.0% -
Two stream (SVM) [117] 88.0% 59.4% -
IDT+MIFS [162] 89.1% 65.1% -
LRCN (RGB) [121] 68.2% - -
LRCN (FLOW) [121] 77.28% - -
LRCN (avg, 1/2-1/2) [121] 80.9% - -
LRCN (avg, 1/3-2/3) [121] 82.34% - -
Very deep two-stream (VGGNet-16) [123] 91.4% - -
TDD [126] 90.3% 63.2% -
TDD + iDT [126] 91.5% 65.9% -
C3D [127] 85.2% - -
C3D + iDT [127] 90.4% - -
TwoStreamFusion [129] 92.5%  65.4% -
TwoStreamFusion+iDT [129] 93.5% 69.2% -
TSN (RGB+FLOW) [131] 94.0% 68.5% -
TSN (RGB+FLOW+WF) [131] 94.2% 69.4% -
Dynamic images + iDT [135] 89.1% 65.2% -
Two-StreamI3D [138] 93.4% 66.4% -
Two-StreamI3D, pre-trained [138] 97.9% 80.2% -
LTC (RGB) [139] 82.4% - -
LTC (FLOW) [139] 85.2% 59.0% -
LTC(FLOW+RGB) [139] 91.7% 64.8% -
LTC(FLOW+RGB)+iDT [139] 92.7% 67.2% -
DB-LSTM [141] 91.21% 87.64% -
Two-Stream SVMP(VGGNet) [143] - 66.1% -
Two-Stream SVMP(ResNet) [143] - 71.0% -
Two-Stream SVMP(+ iDT) [143] - 72.6% -
Two-Stream SVMP(I3D conf) [143] - 83.1% -
STPP + CNN-E (RGB) [145] 85.6% 62.1% -
STPP + LSTM (RGB) [145] 85.0% 62.5% -
STPP + CNN-E (FLOW) [145] 83.2% 55.4% -
STPP + LSTM (FLOW) [145] 83.8% 54.7% -
STPP + CNN-E (RGB+FLOW) [145] 92.4% 70.5% -
STPP + LSTM (RGB+FLOW) [145] 92.6% 70.3% -