Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 1;8(4):207–216. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2017.1100
Table 2: Airborne concentrations of cooking fumes. Figures are mean (SD; range). The difference between two groups is significant (p<0.001) for all variables.
Variable n Kitchen workers Comparison group (n=10)
Formaldehyde (mg/m3) 16 0.45 (0.41; 0.12 to 1.73) 0.001 (<0.001; 0.0011 to 0.0014)
Acetaldehyde (mg/m3) 16 0.13 (0.1; 0.02 to 0.51) Not detected
Acrolein (mg/m3) 16 1.56 (0.41; 0.48 to 2.11) Not detected
TVOCs (mg/m3) 720 1.31 (1.1; 0.34 to 6.9) 0.85 (0.26; 0.48 to 1.27)
PM1 (µg/m3) 576 3.31 (2.6; 1 to 8.5) 0.5 (0.15; 0.3 to 0.8)
PM2.5 (µg/m3) 576 12.21 (5.9; 5.6 to 23) 3.7 (0.69; 3.1 to 5.4)
PM7 (µg/m3) 576 44.5 (16.6; 17.1 to 67.9) 17.7 (1.8; 16.2 to 21.12)