Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2019 Jun 3;59(8):2584–2592. doi: 10.1111/trf.15388

Table 3.

Demographic characteristics, drug use, venues and sexual practices with the sex partners* from 793 male blood donors who answered all the social matrix questions, according to the three classes.

Partners’ Characteristics* Class-1 Class-2 Class-3
n=468 (59.0%) n=117 (14.8%) n=208 (26.2%)
Partner’s age
Age disparity of ≥ ten years for one or more partners 24 (5.1) 40 (34.2) 12 (5.8)
Partner’s type
Main partner 465 (99.4) 65 (55.6) 65 (31.2)
Friend partner 29 (6.2) 41 (35) 61 (29.3)
Acquaintance partner 7 (1.5) 45 (38.5) 80 (38.5)
One time partner 1 (0.2) 36 (30.8) 63 (30.3)
Anonymous or sex worker partner - 47 (40.2) 46 (22.1)
Intravenous drug user (IVDU)
IVDU or partner IVDU 6 (1.3) 10 (8.5) 15 (7.2)
Partner’s MSM - 103 (88.0) -
Partner’s HIV Status
Don’t know partner’s HIV status 56 (12) 94 (80.3) 133 (63.9)
HIV positive partner’s 7 (1.5) 20 (17.1) 4 (1.9)
Venue where met their partners
Meet in the bar/carnival 42 (9.0) 54 (46.2) 63 (30.3)
Meet in the street, park, library, public transportation 59 (12.6) 34 (29.1) 49 (23.6)
Meet in a parties, clubs, political function or church 132 (28.2) 27 (23.1) 79 (38)
Meet in the date service (Internet/Newspaper ads) 9 (1.9) 43 (36.8) 34 (16.3)
Meet some other way/work 243 (51.9) 43 (36.8) 85 (40.9)
Unprotected sexual intercourse
Unprotected vaginal sex 364 (77.8) 27 (23.1) 139 (66.8)
Unprotected heterosexual anal sex 114 (24.4) 17 (14.5) 85 (40.9)
*

Partner’s characteristics were based on the criteria of having at least one partner with such characteristic

Variables that most clearly define the profile classes’ profile

IVDU criteria were defined as lifetime intravenous drug users or lifetime sexual partners of intravenous drug users.