Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2019 Jun 3;59(8):2584–2592. doi: 10.1111/trf.15388

Table 4.

Sensitivity, specificity and positive/negative predictive values in random forest permutation, including all 838 cases and controls male blood donor’s answers for the sociodemographic and sexual matrix questions

Measures/Permutation All variables Without Type of partners variables Without sexual orientation variables Without both partner’s type and sexual orientation variables Without partner’s HIV status
Sensitivity 0.76 0.76 0.69 0.67 0.58
Specificity 0.89 0.89 0.84 0.84 0.94
Positive Predicitive Value 0.85 0.85 0.78 0.78 0.88
Negative Predicitive Value 0.82 0.82 0.77 0.76 0.73