Table 2.

ANOVA Results for Situation Selection, Situation Modification, and Attentional Deployment

Effect	dfa	F	p	ηp2	BFInclusionb	Support
Situation Selection: 3 (valence) × 2 (arousal) × 3 (age group)
Age	2, 222	0.11	.898	.001	0.801	Anecdotal
Valence	1.94, 431	13.14	< .001	.056	1.10e+7	Extreme H1
Age × Valence	3.89,431	3.59	.007	.031	4.74	Moderate H1
Arousal	1,222	1.55	.214	.007	0.034	Strong H0
Age × Arousal	1,222	3.02	.051	.026	0.010	Very Strong H0
Valence × Aro	1.99, 444	0.43	.654	.002	0.004	Extreme H0
Age × Val. × Aro	4.00, 444	1.17	.323	.010	2.80e-5	Extreme H0
Situation Modification: 2 (valence)x 2 (arousal)x 3 (age group)
Age	1, 217	1.18	.308	.011	0.108	Moderate H0
Valence	1, 217	171.79	<.001	.442	∞	Extreme H1
Age × Valence	2, 217	1.84	.161	.017	0.155	Moderate H0
Arousalc	1, 217	19.47	<.001	.082	179555	Extreme H1
Age × Arousal	2, 217	2.18	.115	.020	0.063	Strong H0
Valence × Aro	1, 217	33.98	<.001	.135	32229	Extreme H1
Age × Val. × Aro	2, 217	5.16	.006	.045	0.145	Moderate H0
Attentional Deployment: 3 (valence)x 2 (arousal)x 3 (age group)
Age	1, 152	0.41	.664	.005	0.138	Moderate H0
Valence	2, 304	27.02	<.001	.151	∞	Extreme H1
Age × Valence	4, 304	2.81	.026	.036	0.473	Anecdotal
Arousal	1, 152	85.25	<.001	.359	∞	Extreme H1
Age × Arousal	2, 142	4.15	.018	.052	0.057	Strong H0
Valence × Aro	1.92, 292	91.54	<.001	.376	∞	Extreme H1
Age × Val × Aro	3.84, 292	0.24	.909	.003	0.011	Very strong H0

^aNotes.Where degrees of freedom include decimals, Mauchly’s test of sphericity was significant and the Greenhouse-Geisser correction was used.

^bThe BF_inlusion reflects the degree of support for including the effect in the model, compared to omitting it.