Table 2. Summary of clinical trial for combination therapy in PAH.
Randomized, controlled short-term studies | ||||
Study N design key results | ||||
PACES 87 | 267 | Sildenafil in patients previously treated with epoprostenol | Significant improvement in 6MWT distance, hemodynamics, and time to clinical worsening | |
STEP 88 | 37 | Inhaled iloprost in patients previously treated with bosentan | Trend toward increase in 6MWT distance, but significant improvement in WHO-FC and clinical deterioration | |
COMBI 89 | 40 | Inhaled iloprost in patients previously treated with bosentan | Study prematurely ended after interim analysis; no clinical improvement observed. | |
TRIUMPH 80 | 255 | Inhaled iloprost in patients previously treated with bosentan | Significant improvement in 6MWT distance, but no improvement in WHO-FC or time to clinical worsening. | |
FREEDOM-C 82 | 350 | Oral treprostinil in addition to ERAs and/or PDE-5 inhibitors | No significant improvement in 6MWT distance, WHO-FC, or time to clinical deterioration | |
FREEDOM-C2 83 | 310 | Oral treprostinil in addition to ERAs and/or PDE-5 inhibitors | No significant improvement in 6MWT distance, WHO-FC, or time to clinical deterioration | |
PHIRST 63 | 216 | Subgroup analysis of patients who were given tadalafil + bosentan | No significant improvement in 6MWT distance. No improvement in WHO-FC or time to clinical deterioration in patients previously treated with bosentan | |
IMPRES 90 | 202 | Imatinib in addition to dual or triple combination therapy | Significant improvement in 6MWT distance, PVR and NT-proBNPNo effect on time to clinical worsening. High dropout rate because of adverse effectsUnexpectedly high rate of subdural hematoma | |
PATENT 66 | 222 | Riociguat in addition to ERAs and/or prostacyclin analogues | Significant improvement in 6MWT distance and PVR in previously treated patients | |
PATENT-plus 91 | 18 | Riociguat in addition to sildenafil | No change in systolic blood pressure (primary end point), no efficacy signals, increased hypotensive episodes in the extension phase of the study | |
Event-driven randomized, controlled studies | ||||
Study N design key results | ||||
COMPASS-2 56 | 334 | Bosentan in addition to sildenafil | • No significant improvement in progression-free survival (primary end point) • Significant improvement in 6MWT distance and NT-proBNP after 16 weeks |
|
SERAPHIN 59 | 471 | Macitentan in previously treated patients (predominantly with PDE-5 inhibitors) |
• Significant improvement in progression-free survival (HR 0.62;
p
= 0.009)
• Significant improvement in 6MWT distance, WHO-FC and PVR after 6 months |
|
AMBITION 86 | 500 | Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil versus monotherapy with one of these substances | • 50% risk reduction in time to therapy failure with initial combination therapy • Significant improvement in 6MWT distance and NT-proBNP after 6 months |
|
GRIPHON 84 | 925 | Selexipag in addition to ERAs and/or PDE-5 inhibitors | • 40% reduction in risk for disease progression, almost independently of pre-existing therapy • No improvement in WHO-FC |
Abbreviations: 6MWT, 6-minute walking test; ERA, endothelin receptor antagonist; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PDE-5, phosphodiesterase type 5; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; WHO-FC, World Health Organization functional class.
Adapted with permission from Hoeper MM et al, Targeted therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension, Int J cardiol, 2018. 49