Table 4.
Barriers among travellers visiting friends and relatives (VFRs) to implementing mosquito protective measures while travelling reported in the travel medicine literature compared with those identified during focus groups held in Minnesota and New York with West African immigrants
Barriers reported in literature | Source | Supported in present study |
---|---|---|
Accommodations without bed-nets or screens | 3a | Sometimes |
Longer trips than non-VFRs | 2a,3a,15a,16,17a,18a,23a | Sometimes |
Approximation of risk to that of locals (‘living like locals’) | 2a,3a,16–18a,23a | Sometimes |
Rural exposures expose them to greater risks | 6a,18a | Yes |
Debilitating illness could ruin a trip, but sometimes certain activities are ‘worth the risk’ | 6 | Yes |
High-risk travel during life stages (pregnant, comorbidities, young children) | 2a,15a,20 | n/a |
Chemoprophylaxis use negatively marks VFR travellers as different from the local population and people they visit | 5 | Sometimes |
Don’t use mosquito bite prevention such as repellent | 2a,19 | No |
Preference for mosquito avoidance to using drugs for malaria prevention (covering up at night, using repellents, avoiding stagnant water and using local protective products) | 5,6 | Yes |
Previous negative experience deters bed net usage (exacerbating heat and claustrophobia) and belief that there are more modern ways to prevent mosquito bites | 5,6 | Yes |
Non-routine insecticide in bedroom before sleeping, but this might not be done routinely | 5 | Yes |
Lodging choices are usually not near mosquito breeding sites but acknowledge that sometimes neighbours do not maintain adequate sanitation | 5 | Yes |
Mosquito bite avoidance is not always possible, especially if sitting outside in the evening | 5 | Yes |
Novel barriers identified in present study | ||
Hand hygiene and food/water sanitation are used as malaria prevention tasks to avoid foodborne or waterborne illnesses that may mimic the symptoms of malaria and confound diagnosis and treatment |
Anecdotal barrier noted in publication which was not based on authors’ primary research results.