Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 25;68(9):2090–2098. doi: 10.1002/art.39664

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the First Nations (FN) subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to FN controls and FN first‐degree relatives (FDRs) at the time of enrollment

FN controls (n = 85) FN FDRs (n = 109) FN patients with RA (n = 95)
Age at enrollment, mean ± SD years 36 ± 12 38 ± 14 45 ± 14a
Sex, % female 79 73 82
Current smoker, % 69 85b 79
RFc
Positive, no./total (%)d 5/77 (6) 11/105 (10) 69/94 (73)
Titer, median (IQR) 70 (216) 103 (133) 275 (581)
Anti‐CCPc
Positive, no./total (%)d 4/85 (5) 14/108 (13) 67/93 (72)
Titer, median (IQR) 82 (344) 77 (40) 200 (86)
RF or anti‐CCP positive, no./total (%)d 14/78 (18) 25/106 (24) 76/93 (82)
RF and anti‐CCP positive, no./total (%)d 2/77 (3) 3/105 (3) 61/93 (66)
SE positive, no./total (%)c 41/69 (59) 71/86 (83)e 57/65(88)e
a

P < 0.05 versus FN controls and versus FN FDRs; P < 0.0001 among all 3 groups, by Kruskal‐Wallis independent‐samples test.

b

P = 0.01 versus FN controls; P = 0.02 among all 3 groups, by chi‐square test.

c

Data on seropositivity for rheumatoid factor (RF), anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti‐CCP) antibodies, and shared epitope (SE) were available from a subset of subjects. An RF titer of >50 AU was defined as positive. An anti‐CCP titer of >20 AU was defined as positive. Titers (expressed as median with interquartile range [IQR]) are reported only for antibody‐positive subjects.

d

P < 0.0001 among all 3 groups, by chi‐square test.

e

P = 0.001 versus FN controls.