Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 14;110(5):761–774. doi: 10.1111/add.12876

Table 4.

Pooled prevalence estimates of current and life‐time alcohol dependence among adults living in China for seven outcomes (those with data from 10 studies or more from 1987 to 2013) estimated using DerSimonian–Laird random‐effect models and stratified by the quality of the included studies.a

Outcome Subgroup Quality category No. of studies Pooled estimate (%) 95% CI (%) I2 (%)
Current alcohol dependence Total Low 2 0.5 0.2, 0.8 92.4
Intermediate 12 1.5 1.1, 2.0 99.4
High 3 2.2 1.6, 3.7 82.6
Current alcohol dependence Male Low 1 1.1 0.9, 1.3
Intermediate 6 3.9 2.2, 5.7 99.6
High 4 5.7 3.4, 8.1 97.8
Life‐time alcohol dependence Total Low 12 0.8 0.6, 0.9 99.3
Intermediate 17 2.0 1.6, 2.5 99.4
High 2 3.7 2.5, 4.9 83.7
Life‐time alcohol dependence Males Low 8 4.6 4.0, 5.3 99.4
Intermediate 14 3.7 2.7, 4.7 99.0
High 4 8.9 6.1, 11.6 96.6
Life‐time alcohol dependence Females Low 8 <0.1 <0.1, 0.1 86.4
Intermediate 14 0.1 <0.1, 0.1 80.5
High 2 0.7 <0.1, 1.5 75.6
Life‐time alcohol dependence Urban Low 3 0.2 0.1, 0.3 96.7
Intermediate 11 1.5 1.1, 1.9 98.5
High 1 3.9 2.3, 5.6
Life‐time alcohol dependence Rural Low 4 1.3 1.0, 1.6 99.5
Intermediate 11 1.2 0.8, 1.6 98.5
High 1 2.7 1.7, 3.6
a

The low, intermediate and high quality are based on the score on the 16‐item quality scale (described in Methods section): 0 ~ 7 = low, 8 ~ 12 = intermediate, 13 ~ 16 = high. CI = confidence interval.