Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;200(3):e6–e24. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-1071ST

Table 4.

Summary of Guideline Development Methods

Activity Yes No
Panel assembly included experts from various relevant clinical and nonclinical disciplines  
Management of conflict of interest in the guideline development group and establishing transparency  
Included a methodologist with appropriate expertise (documented expertise in conducting systematic reviews to identify the evidence base and the development of evidence-based recommendations)  
Included an individual who represents the views of patients and society at large  
Literature review performed in collaboration with methodologists  
Searched multiple electronic databases; reviewed reference lists of retrieved articles  
Evidence synthesis applied prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria  
Evaluated included studies for sources of bias  
Used GRADE to describe quality of evidence  
Generation of recommendations used GRADE to rate the strength of recommendations  
External review  

Definition of abbreviation: GRADE = Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.