Table 4.
Activity | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
Panel assembly included experts from various relevant clinical and nonclinical disciplines | ✓ | |
Management of conflict of interest in the guideline development group and establishing transparency | ✓ | |
Included a methodologist with appropriate expertise (documented expertise in conducting systematic reviews to identify the evidence base and the development of evidence-based recommendations) | ✓ | |
Included an individual who represents the views of patients and society at large | ✓ | |
Literature review performed in collaboration with methodologists | ✓ | |
Searched multiple electronic databases; reviewed reference lists of retrieved articles | ✓ | |
Evidence synthesis applied prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria | ✓ | |
Evaluated included studies for sources of bias | ✓ | |
Used GRADE to describe quality of evidence | ✓ | |
Generation of recommendations used GRADE to rate the strength of recommendations | ✓ | |
External review | ✓ |
Definition of abbreviation: GRADE = Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.