Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 27;104(12):1233–1240. doi: 10.1111/apa.12951

Table 3.

Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for factors associated with perinatal mortality at hospitals, Kigali, Rwanda, 18 July 2012 to 8 May 2013

Variables Crudes analysesa Adjusted analysesa
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Socioeconomic determinants
Maternal residence
Urban Reference
Rural 4.15 1.88–9.16 3.31 1.43–7.61
Maternal education
Secondary or higher Reference
Primary 1.17 0.82–1.68 0.73 0.51–2.57
No formal education 1.92 0.93–3.96 1.15 0.47–1.13
Household wealthb
Richer Reference
Middle 1.34 0.89–2.00 1.34 0.86–2.10
Poorer 1.74 1.18–2.57 1.53 0.96–2.46
Type of insurance
Community Reference
State and other insurancesc 0.46 0.25–0.84 0.49 0.25–0.95
Not insured 2.08 0.96–4.50 2.11 0.91–4.89
Proximate determinants
Maternal age at childbirth (years)
<20 1.22 0.61–2.41 1.14 0.57–2.29
20–34 Reference
>34 1.92 1.25–2.93 1.93 1.23–3.02
Parity
0 1.15 0.82–1.61
1–4 Reference
>4 1.35 0.71–2.57
Sex of child
Male 1.12 0.82–1.53
Female Reference
a

Conditional logistic regression performed for analysis of perinatal mortality risks. This type of logistic regression is adapted for a matched case–control study 19. In crude analysis, all factors were included separately in models. In adjusted analysis, socio‐economic factors (maternal education and residence, household wealth, health insurance status) were included simultaneously in model and adjusted for maternal age.

b

Household wealth was assessed using an asset index developed through principal component analysis 18, which provided individual scores for households’ possessions and facilities reported by mothers. The scores were divided into quintiles. Two highest quintiles were considered as ‘richer’, the middle quintile as ‘middle’ and the two lowest quintiles as ‘poorer’.

c

Other insurances: military medical and private insurances.