Table 4.
The calculated Young’s and shear modulus of nanocomposite with three different morphology at different temperature.
| 1 K (GPa) | 100 K (GPa) | 300 K (GPa) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Gr | ET | 48.81 ± 1.37 | 46.12 ± 2.21 | 43.57 ± 5.72 |
| Ez | 5.32 ± 0.31 | 4.62 ± 0.45 | 3.83 ± 1.21 | |
| GL | 0.47 ± 0.07 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | —a | |
| Gxy | 21.25 ± 1.07 | 21.04 ± 1.36 | 16.53 ± 2.33 | |
| Dispersed Gr | ET | 123.43 ± 3.45 | 117.28 ± 4.12 | 105.15 ± 7.27 |
| Ez | 7.37 ± 0.48 | 6.61 ± 0.77 | 5.98 ± 1.36 | |
| GL | 0.35 ± 0.12 | — | — | |
| Gxy | 55.91 ± 2.67 | 52.11 ± 3.11 | 39.63 ± 5.41 | |
| Agglomerated Gr | ET | 137.13 ± 4.15 | 133.23 ± 6.48 | 120.31 ± 7.11 |
| Ez | 6.02 ± 0.74 | 5.56 ± 0.91 | 3.04 ± 1.21 | |
| GL | 0.43 ± 0.11 | — | — | |
| Gxy | 51.50 ± 3.86 | 47.46 ± 2.54 | 43.93 ± 3.14 |
a—Indicates that the corresponding result can‘t be calculated under the current condition.