Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 19;10(7):486. doi: 10.3390/mi10070486

Figure 9.

Figure 9

A comparison of the volatile capture efficiency of allyl methyl sulfide (AMS) and hexanal with respect to molar gas input amount to the device (T = 15 °C, Flow rate = 40–100 mL min−1). The input amounts were varied by sweeping the volume of the input gas (50–500 mL).