. 2019 Jul 8;8(7):210. doi: 10.3390/plants8070210

Table 2.

The topology compared with four phylogenetic tree construction methods.

DNA Region	Tree Method	Rank	obs^a	au^b	np^c	bp^d	pp^e	kh^f	sh^g	wkh^h	wshⁱ
nrDNA ITS	NJ^a	3	2.6	0.358	0.331	0.095	0.067	0.337	0.557	0.285	0.635
	MP^b	4	26.5	0.002	0.002	0.002	3.000 × 10⁻¹²	0.013	0.025	0.013	0.019
	ML^c	1	−2.6	0.681	0.669	0.674	0.866	0.662	0.859	0.662	0.885
	BI^d	2	2.6	0.357	0.331	0.229	0.067	0.338	0.558	0.338	0.648
cpDNA trnL-F	NJ	4	0.4	0.337	0.274	0.275	0.176	0.300	0.309	0.300	0.309
	MP	3	0.0	0.410	0.213	0.210	0.274	0.326	0.743	0.326	0.620
	ML	2	0.0	0.503	0.357	0.351	0.274	0.453	0.682	0.453	0.655
	BI	1	0.0	0.731	0.163	0.164	0.275	0.547	0.997	0.547	0.992
Combined sequence	NJ	4	8.5	0.097	0.077	0.077	1.000 × 10⁻⁴	0.125	0.229	0.125	0.187
	MP	3	0.0	0.328	0.293	0.301	0.009	0.297	0.435	0.297	0.413
	ML	2	0.0	0.165	0.055	0.056	0.495	0.085	0.753	0.085	0.691
	BI	1	0.0	0.867	0.578	0.566	0.496	0.915	0.982	0.915	0.986

Notes: NJ^a = Neighbor-joining; MP^b = Maximum Parsimony; ML^c = Maximum Likelihood; BI^d = Bayesian inference; Obs^a = observed log-likelihood difference to the best topology; au^b = approximately unbiased; np^c = bootstrap probability of the topology (i.e., the probability that the given topology has the largest likelihood in 10 scaled sets of 10,000 bootstrap replicates); bp^d = np with 10 non-scaled sets of 10,000 bootstrap replicates; pp^e = Bayesian posterior probabilities of the model; kh^f = Kishino–Hasegawa; sh^g = Shimodeira–Hasegawa; wkh^h = weighted Kishino–Hasegawa; wshⁱ = weighted Shimodeira–Hasegawa.