Table 1.

Summary of HLM Model Slopes with Treatment Condition (DOCC vs. EUC) Modeled at Level 2

Outcome Variable	Response slope				Maintenance slope
Treatment Effect	B	SE	T	p	B	SE	t	p
APQ ID raw	−0.457	0.282	−1.622	0.106	−0.441	0.139	−3.173	0.002
DOCC vs. EUC	−0.970	0.374	−2.594	0.010	0.303	0.184	1.645	0.101
APQ ID proportion	−0.005	0.004	−1.079	0.281	−0.005	0.002	−2.012	0.045
DOCC vs. EUC	−0.013	0.006	−2.364	0.019	0.004	0.003	1.417	0.157
APQ CP raw	−0.481	0.101	−4.745	<0.001	−0.061	0.051	−1.199	0.232
DOCC vs. EUC	−0.184	0.147	−1.251	0.212	0.004	0.071	0.061	0.952
APQ CP proportion	−0.008	0.002	−4.133	<0.001	−0.000	0.000	−0.249	0.803
DOCC vs. EUC	−0.002	0.003	−0.539	0.591	−0.000	0.001	−0.040	0.968
APQ PP raw	−0.036	0.186	−0.196	0.845	−0.072	0.102	−0.712	0.477
DOCC vs. EUC	0.077	0.264	0.291	0.771	−0.156	0.145	−1.079	0.281
APQ PP proportion	0.013	0.004	3.153	0.002	0.005	0.002	2.146	0.033
DOCC vs. EUC	0.015	0.006	2.502	0.013	−0.004	0.003	−1.390	0.166

APQ = Alabama Parenting Questionnaire; CP = Corporal Punishment; DBD = Disruptive Behavior Disorder; ID = Inconsistent Discipline; PP = Positive Parenting