Table 3. Descriptive of feeding practices for full sample and by ethnicity.
Number of mothers using practice (%) | Frequency of feeding practices per 10 minutes Mean (S.D) |
p-value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal feeding practices | Total N=201 |
Chinese n=121 |
Malay n=56 |
Indian n=24 |
|||
Suggestion | 188 (93.5) | 3.28 (3.11) | 3.02 (3.07) | 3.44 (2.57) | 4.21 (4.24) | 0.208 | |
Prompts | 187 (93.0) | 3.07 (2.94) | 2.91 (2.92) | 3.81 (3.08) | 2.18 (2.41) | 0.048 | |
ASP | 172 (85.6) | 1.80 (1.81) | 1.67 (1.57)a | 2.38 (2.30)b | 1.12 (1.25)a | 0.007 | |
CCP | 148 (73.6) | 1.27 (1.87) | 1.24 (2.10) | 1.43 (1.49) | 1.06 (1.46) | 0.701 | |
% ASP | - | 24.3 (15.2) | 23.3 (14.3) | 27.1 (15.3) | 23.3 (18.9) | 0.284 | |
Restriction | 102 (50.7) | 0.49 (0.71) | 0.55 (0.74) | 0.40 (0.57) | 0.36 (0.82) | 0.274 | |
Questioning child’s choice | 51 (25.4) | 0.17 (0.33) | 0.23 (0.38)a | 0.08 (0.19)b | 0.04 (0.12)b | 0.002 | |
Talking about food/ child’s eating | 195 (97.0) | 3.99 (2.93) | 4.21 (3.14) | 3.89 (2.50) | 3.10 (2.63) | 0.228 | |
Negative comments | 112 (55.7) | 0.54 (0.84) | 0.63 (0.91) | 0.37 (0.55) | 0.49 (0.96) | 0.155 | |
Neutral comments | 191 (95.0) | 2.74 (2.30) | 2.89 (2.47) | 2.71 (2.01) | 2.08 (1.98) | 0.288 | |
Positive comments | 126 (62.7) | 0.71 (0.91) | 0.69 (0.89) | 0.81 (1.00) | 0.53 (0.76) | 0.429 | |
Hurrying | 127 (63.2) | 1.20 (2.09) | 1.30 (2.34)ab | 1.44 (1.83)a | 0.19 (0.42)b | 0.035 | |
Slowing | 80 (39.8) | 0.47 (0.84) | 0.46 (0.87) | 0.42 (0.71) | 0.58 (0.94) | 0.742 | |
Physically feeding child* | 12 (6.0) | 0.05 (0.24) | 0.03 (0.17) | 0.06 (0.25) | 0.15 (0.45) | 0.087 |
Note: “Physically feeding child” was removed from further analysis as incidence was too low. Items with same superscript (a, b) are not significantly different (p>0.05). Abbreviations: ASP: autonomy-supportive prompt to eat; CCP: coercive-controlling prompt to eat. % ASP represents the percentage of total prompts to eat that were of the ASP type.