Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;5(3):390–401. doi: 10.1002/vms3.165

Table 2.

Summary of univariable models investigating potential explanatory risk factors for herd‐level prevalence with RBT and C‐ELISA in parallel combination as the outcome variable. P‐value is shown for each explanatory variable followed by the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the OR

Explanatory variables Parallel combination of RBT and C‐ELISA
Number of buffalo P = 0.0026**
OR 95% CI
1–2 1
3–4 2.02 (0.93, 4.38)
5–8 3.80 (1.69, 8.49)
>8 3.81 (1.51, 9.58)
Number of cattle P = 0.88
1–2 1
3–4 0.81 (0.35, 1.83)
5–8 0.98 (0.25, 3.83)
Retained placenta cases in last year P = 0.0041**
No 1
Yes 1.69 (1.16, 2.46)
Last trimester abortion in last year P = 0.027*
No 1
Yes 2.06 (1.09, 3.89)
Presence of other domestic animals at farm P = 0.52
No 1
Yes 0.82 (0.46, 1.47)
Animal purchased in last year P = 0.096
No 1
Yes 0.61 (0.34, 1.09)