Table 2.
Indices Evaluated | Study Participationa | Study Attritionb | Prognostic Factor Measurementc | Outcome Measurementd | Confounding Measurement and Accounte | Statistical Analysesf |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foley | g | g | h | h | i | h |
CCI (Beddhu) | g | h | h | g | – | – |
Kahn-Wright | g | – | g | g | h | g |
nCI-Liu | g | g | g | g | h | g |
REIN | ||||||
HEC | ||||||
CCI mCCI-IPD mCCI-IHD | g | g | g | g | h | g |
REIN score | g | h | g | h | – | g |
REIN | g | g | g | g | h | g |
Kahn-Wright | g | – | h | g | ? | g |
Davies | ||||||
CCI-H | ||||||
CCI (Di Iorio) | g | h | h | g | – | – |
Doi | – | – | g | h | h | g |
CCI | g | h | h | g | – | g |
ACPI | ||||||
AROii | g | – | g | g | h | g |
Foley | g | g | h | h | – | g |
CCI | g | – | h | h | – | g |
CCI Davies | g | ? | — | g | h | g |
CCI-H Rule-based model | g | h | h | h | g | g |
CCI | – | – | h | – | g | g |
CCI-H | ||||||
CCI-H | g | g | h | h | – | g |
CCI | ||||||
Barthel | g | g | g | g | – | g |
Ivory | g | g | g | g | h | g |
REIN | ||||||
Wagner | ||||||
CCI | g | – | g | g | – | g |
Kahn-Wright | g | ? | h | g | ? | g |
Kahn-Wright | g | ? | h | g | ? | g |
Multifactorial Frailty Score | g | g | g | g | — | g |
SF-36 PCS | — | h | g | g | — | g |
SF-36 MCS | ||||||
Karnofsky scale | ||||||
CCI | _ | ? | h | h | h | g |
CCI-H | ||||||
nCI-Liu | ||||||
CCI | g | g | h | h | – | g |
ACPI | ||||||
Kahn-Wright | ||||||
CCI-H | ||||||
RMRC score | g | h | h | h | g | g |
ICED | h | ? | g | g | h | g |
Obi low GFR | g | g | g | g | h | g |
Obi high GFR | ||||||
REIN score | g | g | h | g | – | g |
RMRC score | ||||||
REIN | g | ? | h | g | ? | g |
NYHA class | g | h | – | g | g | g |
ESRD-SI (RDSS) | ||||||
Kahn-Wright | ||||||
Simple | g | h | g | g | g | g |
Comprehensive | ||||||
REIN | ||||||
Wagner | ||||||
Kahn-Wright | g | – | h | g | h | g |
Davies | ||||||
CCI | ||||||
Wick | g | g | g | g | h | g |
CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; –, does not meet low risk of bias criteria; nCI, new comorbidity index; REIN, Renal Epidemiology and Information Network; HEC, hospice eligibility criteria; mCCI-IPD, Modified CCI Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis; mCCI-IHD, Modified CCI Intermittent Hemodialysis; ?, unknown; CCI-H, Charlson comorbidity index (Hemmelgarn);ACPI, age-comorbidity prognostic index; AROii, Analyzing data, Recognizing excellence, and Optimizing outcomes; SF-36, Short Form 36; PCS, physical component score; MCS, mental component score; RMRC, Registre de Malalts Renals de Catalunya; ICED, Index of Coexisting Disease, NYHA, New York Heart Association; ESRD-SI, End-Stage Renal Disease Severity Index; RDSS, Renal Disease Severity Score.
The study sample represents the population of interest on key characteristics sufficient to limit potential bias to the results.
Loss to follow-up (from sample to study population) is not associated with key characteristics sufficient to limit potential bias (i.e., the study data adequately represent the sample).
The prognostic factor of interest is adequately measured in study participants to sufficiently limit potential bias.
The outcomes of interest are adequately measured in study participants to sufficiently limit potential bias.
Important potential confounders are appropriately accounted for, limiting potential bias with respect to the prognostic factor of interest.
The statistical analysis is appropriate for the design of the study, limiting potential for presentation of invalid results.
Meets low risk of bias criteria.
Unclear; ? unknown/NR.
Does not meet low risk of bias criteria.