Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 30;14(8):1213–1227. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00050119

Table 2.

Risk of bias of the included studies

Indices Evaluated Study Participationa Study Attritionb Prognostic Factor Measurementc Outcome Measurementd Confounding Measurement and Accounte Statistical Analysesf
Foley g g h h i h
CCI (Beddhu) g h h g
Kahn-Wright g g g h g
nCI-Liu g g g g h g
REIN
HEC
CCI mCCI-IPD mCCI-IHD g g g g h g
REIN score g h g h g
REIN g g g g h g
Kahn-Wright g h g ? g
Davies
CCI-H
CCI (Di Iorio) g h h g
Doi g h h g
CCI g h h g g
ACPI
AROii g g g h g
Foley g g h h g
CCI g h h g
CCI Davies g ? g h g
CCI-H Rule-based model g h h h g g
CCI h g g
CCI-H
CCI-H g g h h g
CCI
Barthel g g g g g
Ivory g g g g h g
REIN
Wagner
CCI g g g g
Kahn-Wright g ? h g ? g
Kahn-Wright g ? h g ? g
Multifactorial Frailty Score g g g g g
SF-36 PCS h g g g
SF-36 MCS
Karnofsky scale
CCI _ ? h h h g
CCI-H
nCI-Liu
CCI g g h h g
ACPI
Kahn-Wright
CCI-H
RMRC score g h h h g g
ICED h ? g g h g
Obi low GFR g g g g h g
Obi high GFR
REIN score g g h g g
RMRC score
REIN g ? h g ? g
NYHA class g h g g g
ESRD-SI (RDSS)
Kahn-Wright
Simple g h g g g g
Comprehensive
REIN
Wagner
Kahn-Wright g h g h g
Davies
CCI
Wick g g g g h g

CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; –, does not meet low risk of bias criteria; nCI, new comorbidity index; REIN, Renal Epidemiology and Information Network; HEC, hospice eligibility criteria; mCCI-IPD, Modified CCI Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis; mCCI-IHD, Modified CCI Intermittent Hemodialysis; ?, unknown; CCI-H, Charlson comorbidity index (Hemmelgarn);ACPI, age-comorbidity prognostic index; AROii, Analyzing data, Recognizing excellence, and Optimizing outcomes; SF-36, Short Form 36; PCS, physical component score; MCS, mental component score; RMRC, Registre de Malalts Renals de Catalunya; ICED, Index of Coexisting Disease, NYHA, New York Heart Association; ESRD-SI, End-Stage Renal Disease Severity Index; RDSS, Renal Disease Severity Score.

a

The study sample represents the population of interest on key characteristics sufficient to limit potential bias to the results.

b

Loss to follow-up (from sample to study population) is not associated with key characteristics sufficient to limit potential bias (i.e., the study data adequately represent the sample).

c

The prognostic factor of interest is adequately measured in study participants to sufficiently limit potential bias.

d

The outcomes of interest are adequately measured in study participants to sufficiently limit potential bias.

e

Important potential confounders are appropriately accounted for, limiting potential bias with respect to the prognostic factor of interest.

f

The statistical analysis is appropriate for the design of the study, limiting potential for presentation of invalid results.

g

Meets low risk of bias criteria.

h

Unclear; ? unknown/NR.

i

Does not meet low risk of bias criteria.