Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 29;11(7):1484. doi: 10.3390/nu11071484

Table 2.

Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for cardiovascular disease risk according to energy-adjusted dietary vitaminB6 intake levels stratified by sex.

Vitamin B6 Intake (Quintile) p for Trend
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Men
n 878 879 878 879 878
Case 72 53 52 65 36
Person year 7016 6002 5876 6305 7340
Range (median), mg/day 1.01–1.83 (1.70) 1.84–2.00 (1.93) 2.01–2.16 (2.08) 2.17–2.39 (2.26) 2.40–6.22 (2.61)
Model 1 1 0.88 (0.62, 1.25) 0.88 (0.62, 1.26) 1.02 (0.73, 1.43) 0.48 (0.32, 0.71) 0.001
Model 2 1 1.04 (0.73, 1.49) 1.11 (0.77, 1.59) 1.42 (1.01, 2.00) 0.68 (0.45, 1.02) 0.3
Model 3 1 0.96 (0.67, 1.39) 0.98 (0.68, 1.43) 1.27 (0.88, 1.82) 0.56 (0.36, 0.86) 0.048
Model 4 1 0.90 (0.62, 1.32) 0.89 (0.60, 1.33) 1.10 (0.72, 1.67) 0.44 (0.25, 0.78) 0.02
Women
n 950 950 950 950 950
Case 97 53 47 41 46
Person year 8050 6890 6410 6514 7382
Range (median), mg/day 0.88–1.73 (1.58) 1.74–1.92 (1.84) 1.93–2.08 (2.00) 2.09–2.29 (2.17) 2.30–7.51 (2.48)
Model 1 1 0.65 (0.46, 0.90) 0.62 (0.44, 0.88) 0.53 (0.37, 0.77) 0.52 (0.37, 0.74) <0.001
Model 2 1 0.70 (0.50, 0.98) 0.74 (0.52, 1.05) 0.74 (0.51, 1.08) 0.75 (0.53, 1.07) 0.1
Model 3 1 0.77 (0.54, 1.09) 0.84 (0.59, 1.22) 0.86 (0.58, 1.27) 0.76 (0.51, 1.13) 0.2
Model 4 1 0.78 (0.55, 1.12) 0.88 (0.60, 1.30) 0.93 (0.60, 1.43) 0.87 (0.53, 1.44) 0.6

Q, quintile. Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for age. Model 3: additionally adjusted for monthly household income, body mass index, educational levels, physical activity levels, residential area, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and hypertension and diabetes at baseline. Model 4: model 3 plus additionally adjusted total energy intake, three major nutrient factors identified in the principal component analysis and use of dietary supplement.