Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 12;11(7):1577. doi: 10.3390/nu11071577

Table 6.

Mean scores for the sensory evaluation of PVA-biofortified maize and OFSP dishes compared with the control white maize and CFSP dishes (n = 120).

Sensory Attributes Taste Texture Aroma Colour Overall Acceptability
Composite dishes
White phutu and chicken curry 3.9 a (0.9) b 3.9 (0.9) 4.1 (0.7) 3.9 (0.7) 4.1 (0.6)
PVA phutu and chicken curry 4.0 (0.8) 3.9 (0.9) 4.0 (0.7) 4.0 (0.8) 4.1 (0.7)
White phutu and cabbage curry 3.9 (0.9) 3.7 (1.0) 3.8 (0.8) 3.8 (0.8) 3.9 (0.7)
PVA phutu and cabbage curry 3.9 (0.8) 3.8 (0.9) 3.9 (0.8) 3.9 (0.8) 4.1 (0.8)
White phutu and bambara groundnut curry 3.5 (1.2) 3.4 (1.2) 3.6 (0.9) 3.7 (0.8) 3.7 (1.1)
PVA phutu and bambara groundnut curry 3.2 (1.1) 3.4 (1.2) 3.5 (1.0) 3.6 (0.9) 3.7 (1.0)
p-value c <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Sweet potato
CFSP 4.2 (0.9) 4.1 (0.9) 3.9 (0.8) 3.9 (0.9) 4.1 (0.8)
OFSP 4.1 (0.9) 4.0 (1.0) 3.8 (0.9) 3.9 (0.9) 4.1 (0.9)
p-value d ns ns ns ns ns

a Mean; b Standard deviation; c Friedman’s test; d The Wilcoxon test; PVA= Provitamin A; CFSP = Cream-fleshed sweet potato; OFSP = Orange-fleshed sweet potato; ns = not significant.