Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy |
Preeclampsia |
Pregnant women |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation compared to placebo reduced the risk of preeclampsia, RR 0.45, (95% CI: 0.31 to 0.65) [48]. |
|
|
Pregnant women with low basal calcium intake |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation compared to placebo reduced the risk of preeclampsia, RR 0.36, (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.65) [48]. |
|
High blood pressure |
Pregnant women |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation compared to placebo reduced the high blood pressure relative risk (RR) to 0.65, (95% CI: 0.53 to 0.81) [48]. |
Blood pressure |
Blood pressure |
Normotensive adults |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) in adults by 1.14 mmHg (95% CI: −2.01 to −0.27) with doses of calcium 1000 to 1500 mg/day and by 2.79 mmHg (95% CI: −4.71 to −0.86) with doses of calcium equal to or over 1500 mg/day. Calcium supplementation had the greatest effect in young adults of less than 35 years as their SBP was reduced by 2.11 mmHg (95%CI: −3.58 to −0.64) [45]. |
|
Blood pressure |
Hypertensive adults |
|
Calcium supplementation reduced SBP by −1.86 mm Hg (95% CI: −2.91 to −0.81) and diastolic BP (DBP) by −0.99 mm Hg (95% CI: −1.61 to −0.37) [46]. |
|
Blood pressure |
Hypertensive adults with low basal calcium intake |
|
In people with relatively low calcium intake (≤ 800 mg per day) calcium supplementation reduced SBP by −2.63 (95% CI: −4.03 to −1.24) and DBP by −1.30 (95% CI: −2.13 to −0.47) [46]. |
|
Blood pressure |
Hypertensive adults |
|
Calcium supplementation as compared to control induced a statistically significant reduction in SBP (mean difference: −2.5 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.5 to −0.6, I(2)= 42%) but not DBP (mean difference: −0.8 mmHg, 95% CI: −2.1 to 0.4, I(2) = 48%) [47]. |
Progeny blood pressure |
High blood pressure |
Pregnant women/children |
RCT |
Calcium supplementation showed that children whose mothers received calcium supplementation had, at seven years of age, a reduction in the risk of high blood pressure (above the 90th percentile) in comparison with children whose mothers were in the placebo group (RR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.90) [55]. |
Cholesterol |
LDL and HDL Cholesterol |
Adults |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol [−0.12 mmol/L (95% CI: −0.22 to −0.02)] and increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol [0.05 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.10) [59]. |
Colorectal adenomas |
Recurrent colorectal adenomas |
Adults with previous adenomas |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation with doses from 1200 to 2000 mg/day and treatment duration from 36 to 60 months reduced the risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas, RR = 0.89, (95%CI: 0.82–0.96) [65]. |
Bone health |
Bone mineral density |
Children |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation had a small effect on total body bone mineral content (standardised mean difference 0.14, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.27) and upper limb bone mineral density (0.14, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.24), and this effect persisted after the end of supplementation only in the upper limb (0.14, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.28) [61]. |
Renal stones |
Urolithiasis |
Individuals with osteoporosis |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation compared to placebo, RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.19, 2.34]; 5 studies in postmenopausal or elderly women including 2038 subjects [70]. |
|
Urolithiasis |
Pregnant women |
Meta-Analysis |
Calcium supplementation during pregnancy did not increase the risk of urolithiasis, RR 1.52 [95% CI: 0.06, 40.67] or renal colic, RR 1.75 [95% CI; 0.51, 5.99] in 2 studies with 12901 women [71]. |