Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;47(7):2800–2809. doi: 10.1177/0300060519855869

Table 2.

OR and 95% CI for hepatocellular cancer and rs1128503 or rs1045642 polymorphism in MDR1 under different genetic models.

Genetic models n OR (95% CI) P (OR) Analysis model I2(%) P(H) P (Egger) P (Begg)
rs1128503 T>C
 Allele (C vs. T) 4 0.91 (0.76, 1.08) 0.260 F (M-H) 42.8 0.155 0.082 0.308
 Homozygous model (CC vs. TT) 4 0.80 (0.57, 1.12) 0.193 F (M-H) 46.2 0.134 0.225 0.308
 Heterozygous model (CT vs. TT) 4 0.77 (0.56, 1.04) 0.093 F (M-H) 40.5 0.169 0.914 1.000
 Recessive model (CC vs. CT+TT) 4 0.95 (0.73, 1.25) 0.729 F (M-H) 19.1 0.295 0.230 0.734
 Dominant model (CC+CT vs. TT) 4 0.81 (0.61, 1.07) 0.137 F (M-H) 48.5 0.120 0.592 0.734
rs1045642 T>C
 Allele (C vs. T) 3 1.10 (0.83, 1.45) 0.505 F (M-H) 0 0.435 0.293 1.000
 Homozygous model (CC vs. TT) 3 1.16 (0.67, 2.01) 0.587 F (M-H) 0 0.421 0.100 0.296
 Heterozygous model (CT vs. TT) 3 0.93 (0.55, 1.60) 0.800 F (M-H) 29.2 0.243 0.755 1.000
 Recessive model (CC vs. CT+TT) 3 1.21 (0.81, 1.80) 0.354 F (M-H) 0 0.660 0.481 0.296
 Dominant model (CC+CT vs. TT) 3 1.01 (0.62, 1.65) 0.962 F (M-H) 30.3 0.238 0.450 1.000

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P(OR), probability for odds ratio; P(H), P for heterogeneity; n, number of the included studies; F, fixed-effect model; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel method.