Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2017 Sep 28;73(1):62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.008

Table 1 –

S-TRAC selected baseline characteristics and summary of study outcome

Sunitinib Placebo
Patients assigned for treatment/treated (n) 309/306 306/304
Median age, yr (interquartile range) 57 (49–64) 58 (51–66)
Male/female (%) 72/28 75/25
ECOG PS, n (%)
 0 228 (74) 220 (72)
 1 79 (26) 84 (28)
 ≥2 1 (0.3) 0
UCLA integrated staging system, n (%)
 T3 low a 115 (37) 112 (37)
 T3 high b 165 (53) 166 (54)
 T4 or any T/N+ c 29 (9.4) 28 (9.2)
Patients who completed full 1-yr treatment, n (%) 170 (56) 211 (69)
Median treatment duration, mo (interquartile range) 12.4 (6.0–12.5) 12.4 (9.2–12.5)
Median daily dose, mg (interquartile range) 45.9 (38.4–50) 50 (49–50.2)
Median DFS, yr (95% CI) d 6.8 (5.8–NR) 5.6 (3.8–6.6)
DFS hazard ratio (95% CI) for sunitinib vs placebo d 0.76 (0.59–0.98)

CI = confidence interval; DFS = disease-free survival; ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; NR = not reached; UCLA = University of California Los Angeles.

a

T3, no or undetermined nodal involvement, no metastasis, any Fuhrman grade, ECOG PS 0 or Fuhrman grade 1, ECOG PS 1.

b

T3, no or undetermined nodal involvement, no metastasis, Fuhrman grade ≥2, ECOG PS ≥1.

c

T4 or any T with nodal involvement, no metastasis, any Fuhrman grade, any ECOG PS.

d

According to blinded independent central review.