Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2018 Dec;30(5):1729–1747. doi: 10.1017/S095457941800127X

Table 4.

Regions of significance and simple slopes for significant interactions

Regions of Significance for the Polygenic Score Simple Slopes for the Polygenic Score by Intervention Status

Lower Bound Upper Bound Control Intervention
Polygenic Score (p = .05) Total Symptoms General Anxiety −2.019 .493 2.066* (.891) −1.195 (.865)
General Anxiety −1.941 .494 .403** (.159) −.186 (.154)
Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms −1.015 1.847 .248** (.090) −.052 (.086)
Manic Symptoms −1.031 .934 .391* (.170) −.271 (.165)

Polygenic Score (p = .10) Total Symptoms −5.380 .660 1.466 (.901) −1.204 (.894
General Anxiety −2.161 .501 .371* (.160) −.197 (.159)
Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms −.970 1.669 .240** (.090) −.067 (.089)
Manic Symptoms −4.088 2.497 .112 (.172) −.371* (.171)

Note. Polygenic risk scores were Z-scored, so regions of significance are on a metric of standard deviations above and below the mean. The control and intervention groups are significantly different outside the upper and lower bounds of the region of significance for all models.