Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May 30;26(9):2738–2746. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07475-9

TABLE 1.

Clinical presentation, imaging, and biopsy characteristics by extent of the DCISM lesion

DCISM suspected [n = 105] DCISM definite 1 focus [n =175] DCISM definite >1 focus 1 biopsy [n = 67] DCISM definite >1 focus >1 biopsy [n = 22] p-Value DCISM definite total [n = 264] p-Value
Clinical characteristics
 Age, years [median (IQR)] 57 (48–65) 53 (46–61) 54 [47–62] 55 (48–61) 0.20 53 (47–61) 0.04
 Palpable mass 3 (3) 17 (10) 3 (5) 2 (9) 0.13 22 (8) 0.06
Imaging characteristics
 Diagnosed by: 0.005 0.004
  Mammogram 93 (89) 137 (78) 52 (78) 12 (54) 201 (76)
  Ultrasound 2 (29) 6 (3) 2 (3) 0 (0) 8 (3)
  MRI 4 (48) 11 (6) 4 (6) 1 (5) 16 (6)
  Multiple 6 (67) 21 (11) 9 (12) 9 (41) 39 (15)
 Mass or asymmetry on imaging 18 (17) 31 (18) 19 (28) 5 (23) 0.25 55 (21) 0.42
 Extent of calcificationsa 0.13 0.67
  Small cluster(s) or <1 cm 23 (23) 44 (28) 17 (30) 2 (10) 63 (27)
  1 to <5 cm 47 (49) 74 (47) 28 (49) 9 (43) 111 (47)
  5 to <10 cm 19 (20) 22 (14) 10 (18) 7 (33) 39 (17)
  ≥10 cm or diffuse 2 (2) 7 (5) 1 (2) 3 (14) 11 (5)
  Calcifications present but no size provided 6 (6) 9 (6) 1 (2) 0 (0) 10 (4)
 Biopsy guidance <0.001 0.02
  Stereotactic 95 (91) 136 (78) 53 (79) 14 (64) 203 (77)
  Ultrasound 7 (7) 29 (17) 9 (13) 0 (0.0) 38 (14)
  MRI 3 (3) 9 (5) 5 (8) 1 (5) 15 (6)
  Multiple biopsy types 0 (0.0) 1 (1) 0 (0.0) 7 (32) 8 (3)
Pathologic characteristics on core needle biopsy
 Necrosisb 93 (93) 149 (96) 58 (92) 17 (90) 0.61 224 (94) 0.70
 Nuclear gradeb,c 0.008 0.19
  Low 3 (3) 7 (4) 1 (25) 0 (0) 8 (3)
  Low to intermediate 5 (5) 7 (4) 4 (6) 0 (0) 11 (4)
  Intermediate 32 (31) 36 (21) 11 (17) 3 (14) 50 (19)
  Intermediate to high 17 (16) 43 (25) 7 (11) 4 (18) 54 (21)
  High 47 (45) 80 (46) 43 (65) 15 (6) 138 (52)
 Lymphocytic reaction 5 (5) 7 (4) 5 (8) 1 (5) 0.74 5 (5) 0.95
 Presence of calcifications 90 (94) 149 (97) 50 (94) 21 (100) 0.48 220 (97) 0.27
 Architectureb 0.31 0.60
  Solid 32 (31) 57 (33) 22 (33) 4 (18) 83 (32)
  Cribriform 8 (8) 9 (5) 3 (5) 0 (0) 12 (5)
  Micropapillary 0 (0) 2 (1) 1 (2) 0 (0) 3(1)
  Papillary 0 (0) 0 (0.0) 2 (3) 0 (0) 2 (18)
  Tubular 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.4)
  Mixed 63 (61) 104 (60) 38 (58) 18 (82) 160 (61)
Treatment
 Surgical management 0.002 0.72
  Lumpectomy 57 (54) 97 (55) 38 (57) 3 (14) 138 (52)
  Mastectomy 48 (46) 78 (45) 29 (43) 19 (86) 126 (48)
 Axillary evaluation <0.001 <0.001
  No axillary evaluation 24 (23) 12 (7) 3 (5) 0 (0) 15 (6)
  SLNB only 81 (77) 154 (88) 58 (87) 18 (82) 230 (87)
  SLNBandALND 0 (0) 9 (5) 6 (9) 4 (18) 19 (7)

Data are expressed as n (%) unless otherwise specified

Percentages are rounded

DCISM ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion, IQR interquartile range, SLNB sentinel lymph node biopsy, ALND axillary lymph node dissection, MRI magnetic resonance imaging

a

Data on the extent of calcifications were missing in 9 patients (2.4%), while the 29 remaining patients had no calcifications

b

Data on necrosis were missing in 31 patients (8%; on nuclear grade in 4 patients (1%) and on architecture in 5 patients (1%)