Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Jun 27;33(5):442–456. doi: 10.1037/adb0000476

Table 4.

Significant Specific-Indirect Effects from the Autoregressive Mediation Model (N = 385)

Panel A. AUD→NFC(11) Specific-indirect
Effect
(95% CI)
AUD→FS(9)→DEP(9)→NFC(9)→NFC(10)→NFC(n) (0.04 – 0.20)
AUD→FS(9)→FS(10)→DEP(10)→NFC(10)→NFC(11) (0.02 – 0.33)
AUD→FS(9)→DEP(9)→DEP(10)→NFC(10)→NFC(11) (0.04 – 0.36)
AUD→FS(9)→NFC(9)→NFC(10)→NFC(11) (0.02 – 0.23)
Panel B. AUD → Early-onset Specific-indirect
Effect
(95% CI)
AUD→FS(9)→DEP(9)→NFC(9)→NFC(10)→NFC(11)→Early Onset (0.01 – 0.08)
AUD→FS(9)→FS(10)→DEP(10)→NFC(10)→NFC(11)→Early Onset (0.00 – 0.10)
AUD→FS(9)→DEP(9)→DEP(10)→NFC(10)→NFC(11)→Eariy Onset (0.00 – 0.11)
AUD→FS(9)→NFC(9)→NFC(10)→NFC(11)→Early Onset (0.00 – 0.09)

Abbreviations. 95% CI = 95% Confidence interval based on 1,000 bootstrapped bias-corrected confidence intervals; FS = financial strain; AUD = maternal alcohol use disorder; AUD = maternal alcohol use disorder; ALC = maternal alcohol use; DEP = maternal depressive symptoms, NFC = negative family climate; (#) = age of child when construct measured.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01 (two-tailed test)