Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 6;9(9):323. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1853-y

Table 2.

Experimental design and the response of central composite design (CCD) and artificial neural network (ANN)

Run Wheat bran extract* Yeast extract* CaCl2* Enzyme Activity (U/mL)
X 1 X 2 X 3 Experimental RSM predicted ANN predicted
1 0 (35) 0 (15) 0 (3) 4172.13 4130.11 4172.11
2 − 1 (20) 1 (20) − 1 (2) 3639.34 3649.92 3639.31
3 0 (35) 0 (15) 0 (3) 4172.13 4130.11
4 0 (35) − 1.68 (6.59) 0 (3) 2483.61 2533.29 2483.59
5 1 (50) − 1 (10) − 1 (2) 2909.84 2896.20 2909.83
6 0 (35) 0 (15) 0 (3) 4114.75 4130.11
7 − 1 (20) − 1 (10) − 1 (2) 2655.74 2673.42 2655.89
8 − 1.68 (9.77) 0 (15) 0 (3) 3368.85 3390.17 3368.83
9 0 (35) 0 (15) 0 (3) 4122.95 4130.11
10 0 (35) 1.68 (23.41) 0 (3) 3713.11 3727.62 3712.86
11 1.68 (60.23) 0 (15) 0 (3) 3508.2 3551.17 3508.20
12 1 (50) − 1 (10) 1 (4) 3327.87 3270.00 3327.85
13 − 1 (20) 1 (20) 1 (4) 3778.69 3745.12 3778.67
14 0 (35) 0 (15) − 1.68 (0.07) 3606.56 3560.41 3606.54
15 0 (35) 0 (15) 1.68 3844.26 3954.79 3844.24
16 0 (35) 0 (15) 0 (3) 4040.98 4130.11
17 1 (50) 1 (20) − 1 (2) 3934.43 3958.80 3942.18
18 0 (35) 0 (15) 0 (3) 4172.13 4130.11
19 − 1 (20) − 1 (10) 1 (4) 3459.02 3387.42 3459.01
20 1 (50) 1 (20) 1 (4) 3778.69 3713.80 3778.67

*Uncoded values (g/L) are shown in parentheses