Table 1.
Electrochemical performance of the GP10C electrode compared with other recently reported results in the literature
Material | Method | Specific capacitance | Scan rate/current density | Electrolyte | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
rGO/PANI/rGO paper | Vacuum filtration | 55 Fg−1 | 1 Ag−1 | 1 M H2SO4 | [20] |
rGO paper | Vacuum filtration | 80 Fg−1 | 0.5 Ag−1 | 6 M KOH | [21] |
rGO paper | Vacuum filtration | 130 Fg−1 | 0.1 Ag−1 | 6 M KOH | [22] |
rGO/Fe2O3 paper | Vacuum filtration | 178 Fcm−1 | 1 mVs−1 | 3 M KOH | [23] |
Graphene/MnO2 paper | Vacuum filtration | 217 Fg−1 | 0.1 Ag−1 | 1 M Na2SO4 | [26] |
P-rGO paper | Self- assembled on Cu foil | 100 Fg−1 | 100 mVs−1 | 1 M H2SO4 | [63] |
MnO2 NW/CNT paper | Vacuum filtration | 167.5 Fg−1 | 0.077 Ag−1 | 0.1 M Na2SO4 | [64] |
Graphene/CNT paper | Vacuum filtration | 126 Fg−1 | 1 Ag−1 | 6 M KOH | [65] |
rGO/CB paper | Vacuum filtration | 95.5 Fg−1 | 5 mVs−1 | 1 M H2SO4 | [66] |
GP10C film | Self-assembled plus reduction | 200 Fg−1 | 0.25 Ag−1 | 2 M KOH | In this work |