Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 31;6:44. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00044

Table 4.

Continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) scores from the 45 patients included from the EILO register at Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen (Norway) who were surgically treated for EILO during 2013–2015a.

CLE conditions Pre-operative Post-operative Pre-post change
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) 95% CI
MODERATE INTENSITY
Glottic (CLE A) 0.27 (0.49) 0.09 (0.36) 0.18 (0.44) (−0.08, 0.43)
Supraglottic (CLE B) 1.18 (0.96) 0.49 (0.73) 0.69 (0.73) (0.43, 0.94)
MAXIMUM INTENSITY
Glottic (CLE C) 1.51 (0.92) 0.84 (0.93) 0.67 (0.93) (0.41, 0.92)
Supraglottic (CLE D) 2.42 (0.54) 0.93 (0.78) 1.49 (0.81) (1.23, 1.74)
Sum score (CLE E) 5.38 (2.07) 2.36 (1.85) 3.02 (1.60) (2.54, 3.50)b

CLE A, glottic obstruction at moderate intensity; CLE B, supraglottic obstruction at moderate intensity; CLE C, glottic obstruction at maximum intensity; CLE D, supraglottic obstruction at maximum intensity; CLE E, sum-score (A + B + C + D), see Figure 1 for illustrations on CLE score; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

a

In the final mixed linear regression model: CLE-score = constant + surgery + Intensity + location + surgery*Intensity + surgery*location, where all included effects were significant (p < 0.001).

b

Estimates from Student's paired t-test, p < 0.001.