Table.
Amblyopic,
n
= 91 |
Nonamblyopic,
n
= 79 |
Normal Control,
n
= 20 |
|
% Female | 45% | 44% | 45% |
Age, y | |||
Mean ± SD | 9.0 ± 1.7 | 8.5 ± 2.1 | 8.6 ± 1.5 |
Range | 6.1–12.9 | 6.0–12.7 | 6.0–12.1 |
Diagnostic group, n (%) | |||
Strabismus | 19 (21%) | 33 (42%) | – |
Anisometropia | 41 (45%) | 22 (28%) | |
Both | 31 (34%) | 24 (30%) | |
Amblyopic eye BCVA,* logMAR | |||
Mean ± SD | 0.46 ± 0.26 | – | – |
Range | 0.20–1.50 | ||
Fellow eye BCVA,† logMAR | |||
Mean ± SD | −0.03 ± 0.07 | −0.01 ± 0.08 | −0.06 ± 0.07 |
Range | −0.10–0.10 | −0.10–0.10 | −0.10–0.10 |
Stereoacuity, log arcsecs | |||
Mean ± SD | 3.50 ± 0.77 | 2.92 ± 1.08 | 1.60 ± 0.18 |
Range | 1.60–nil | 1.30–nil | 1.30–1.80 |
Contrast balance index | |||
Mean ± SD | 10.0 ± 16.7 | 3.8 ± 5.5 | – |
Range | 0.9–99 | 0.8–32.3 | |
Age at initiation of patching, y | |||
Mean ± SD | 4.6 ± 1.8 | – | – |
Range | 0.5–6.3 | ||
Duration of patching, y | – | ||
Mean ± SD | 2.3 ± 1.9 | – | |
Range‡ | 0.0–7.1 | ||
BCVA improvement with patching, logMAR | – | ||
Mean ± SD | 0.30 ± 0.30 | – | |
Range | −0.30–1.20 | ||
% with binocular treatment§ | 49% | – | – |